WeChat ID
aaronpk_tv
-
-
dgold
https://micro.blog/dgold
•
Mar 25
@aaronpk Wow! That's an incredible thing to put out there & available, aaron, thank you.
The nice thing is it doesn't require that the bridge store anything, even user credentials, so it doesn't take a lot of server resources to run! I am curious how many people will find fun edge cases from various blogging apps tho! -
RSS is undead | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)"It’s wonderfully idealistic, but the reality of RSS is that it lacks the features required by nearly every actor in the modern content ecosystem"
-
Nothing to see here. Just getting a live streaming rig together for #NAB2018.
.
What can you spot on this setup?
.
..
#LumixAmbassador #WhereLUMIXGoes #tw #fb
-
This is incredible! I used to love this game
-
A MetaWeblog to Micropub Gateway
I’m always looking for fun and better ways to publish content to my website. There are several nice writing apps now, such as Byword for MacOS, which lets you write in Markdown and then converts it into HTML. Many of these kinds of apps have an option to publish to a Wordpress site, using Wordpress’ XML-RPC interface, which is more or less the MetaWeblog API.continue reading... -
Matt Biilmann
http://www.netlify.com
•
Apr 8
I would recommend adding it as an env var in the Netlify UI - there it will only be exposed to your build environment and any Lambda functions you run.
That's probably a better idea :-) In any case the token only provides read access so it's not a huge deal. -
ah, if you don't mind everyone having access to query your webmentions on https://webmention.io then it's fine to make that public, either in github or in Javascript on your site.
-
Frederic Hemberger
https://frederic-hemberger.de
•
Apr 8
@aaronpk Hi Aaron, I'm trying to implement webmentions on my site. Unfortunately, @netlify doesn't support encrypted env vars, so I'm not sure if pushing the API token to GitHub in clear text is a good idea. Any thoughts?
Which API token are you talking about? Also might be easier to come chat about this in IRC/Slack: https://indieweb.org/discuss -
That was a great one this week! I really enjoyed the summaries of all the links added to the various wiki pages!
-
Agreed on removing the filter. Until there is a good use case for a plugin modifying the behavior of the plugin that also wants to provide finer-grained access, there's no need to make that part extensible. Supporting the primary list of scopes create/update/delete/undelete is good for now, and you could also accept "post" if it's requested for legacy clients.
