The minutes were posted on the wiki shortly after the conclusion of yesterday's call. You can always find the link to the minutes from the agenda page. Please check there before complaining the minutes are not posted.
You have been told in the past that it is fine that Tantek is not reading the mailing list. http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2015-03-10/line/1426011511341
Additionally from Harry's email last time this came up, "there is no mechanism anywhere in W3C process that can force someone to respond to email except (for now) the Last Call process and Formal Objection process." https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Apr/0097.html
Your -1 vote was overridden by the chair because the chair thought your -1 was due to a misunderstanding of the proposal, and you were not on the call to clarify your position. You were invited to join the next call if you have new information to add. That is documented in the minutes here https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-07-28-minutes#override
Your current proposal to re-open the issue of renaming the story is un-founded. You have not provided any new information, which is required in order to re-open an issue. You have blatantly ignored repeated questions asking for clarification about *why* your implementation is affected by renaming the story.
If you would like to contribute to this group, I would suggest adding some information from the SoLiD perspective to the brainstorming document where we are trying to get a sense of how to converge the approaches. So far nobody from the SoLiD perspective has stepped up. https://github.com/w3c-social/Social-APIs-Brainstorming