@aaronpk I’m curious if the choicrs follow the pattern of 4-choice tests I’ve seen: one highly improbable, slightly amusing answer, one obviously wrong if you’re paying attention, one almost correct?
WeChat ID
aaronpk_tv
@aaronpk I’m curious if the choicrs follow the pattern of 4-choice tests I’ve seen: one highly improbable, slightly amusing answer, one obviously wrong if you’re paying attention, one almost correct?
@aaronpk
Interesting! When I asked it to write that spy thriller treatment, it got the story structure right (including a twist), but ignored the deep prompts I gave it in the choice of characters (Watergate conspirator Donald Segretti as a spy & a senile Winston Churchill as his handler).
I would’ve thought it would pull the structure of a multiple choice test from its training data, but be boring in how it created the answers, as it was with my treatment.