WeChat ID
aaronpk_tv
#w3c
-
+0 This seems like it's already covered by the ability to share a list of "friends" with applications. -
+1 I have already implemented publishing my weight from my bathroom scale http://aaronparecki.com/metrics/weight
-
-1 Unclear what the actual goals or concrete implementation would be.
-
-1 This seems like a duplicate
-
-1 As much as I love location-based tech and live-updating GPS trails, I don't see how this fits into a social web API, much less the first version of one. A lot of this communication could take place with public or private group messages as well.
-
-1 Out of scope for the first version especially because of the restriction of "only the current buyer and the company..."
-
-0 This seems overly complicated for a first version. Also it is not clear whether the content being created is supposed to be private.
-
-0 Agreed with Evan Prodromou
-
-0 Agreed that this seems similar to existing stories. Adding a "-" because I don't understand the relevance of the NASDAQ info lookup.
-
-0 I don't think browsing contact lists is useful for the first version, especially if there is already a way to browse following/follower lists.
-
-0 This sounds like a post with comments. The only thing unique is marking a particular comment as the "answer".
-
+1 I currently tag my own posts with a location, and plan to support other people adding (or suggesting) locations for my posts
-
+1 I plan to implement this
-
+1 This is what the IndieWeb community has been calling a "reader", of which there are now several working prototypes built.
-
+0 Does not seem necessary for a first version, since a reasonable fallback could be to post a text note instead. In any case, a plain text fallback should be part of this so consumers that don't recognize the custom type can display something. This is based on my implementation of posting "food" posts of what I eat and drink on my website.
-
+1 I am currently able to do all of this from my website, and would like to fill out the Micropub spec to support each action.
-
-0 I have found contact lists to be too much effort to maintain, and instead post content to specific people or within specific groups.
-
+0 Agreed that groups are necessary, but would be okay with not including it in the first version.
-
+1 but with "tags" instead of "folders". I've been tagging content on my site since 2012 (http://aaronparecki.com/tags, http://aaronparecki.com/tag/indieweb)
-
-0 Agree with Ben
