Aaron Parecki

@aaronpk Hey, on another note: after conversation with NewsBlur's developer, I'm thinking about RFC5005 as a way for feed consumers to reduce storage costs, and I wondered if this makes sense to you. If you know you can re-fetch any feed entry from the origin server at any time because it has paginated archives, then you can aggressively discard your cached copy of anything whenever you want... right?

@aaronpk id property has to be either content-negotiable or always json. url property can be html. you may use <link> tags in html to point to json resources, also.

@wakest
I have seen @aaronpk getting couple of times mentioned, but have never seen a reply back. So I'm not shure if messages are comming in. @xuv

@aaronpk hey its working! so how are you getting notified? you wrote an interface for it?

how did you get #ActivityPub working in #p3k? and is that part released yet? I didn't see it mentioned here https://indieweb.org/p3k

@aaronpk

It probably wouldn't be super hard to write a nginx module to enable content negotiation, if there was an interest in it

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:11 PM Aaron Parecki notifications@github.com wrote:

This would allow a static site to serve ActivityPub objects as well as human-readable HTML. Currently it's not possible to do this, since static sites can't do content negotiation of course.

— You are receiving this because you commented.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/310#issuecomment-404338732, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAORV8zh504acM1VU-qjYTFjpKw1xwpDks5uFoYjgaJpZM4UdtrM .

@aaronpk @cleverdevil I'm not sure that adding native support in Indigenous for IndiePaper is the right step now. With https://github.com/cleverdevil/Indiepaper-macOS/pull/3 and the fact that every url in Indigenous allows you to open a ShareSheet, it doesn't make as much sense to me to bundle IndiePaper when IndiePaper (and other future services) can just have their own app in the Share Sheet.

Any thoughts for or against that train of thinking?

I think the only real outcome of this item would be being able to select a channel to have offline caching of posts.

@aaronpk can confirm. But it’s OK — it’s fun!

@aaronpk ok done

@aaronpk Cool! Thanks for checking.

@0x1C3B00DA

@aaronpk Hey, sorry to reply to a random post, but I don't think your site accepts bare mentions from Mastodon.

I think there's something funky with your AP implementation and Pleroma. I've been following you for a few days from my pleroma acct, but haven't received any posts from you.