What I'm saying is I actually don't think a global number of ... • Aaron Parecki

44°F

Balaji S. Srinivasan https://twitter.com/balajis • Jul 25
Yeah. I think the right model may be to use Postgres or traditional DBs for *most* of the system, and a blockchain for the parts people will fight over.

So things like upvotes, likes, follower counts — and of course money.

We haven’t seen systems consciously built this way yet.

What I'm saying is I actually don't think a global number of likes on a post is even a good idea. What's more interesting is how many ppl within my own network have liked a post.

Otherwise we're just mirroring Twitter along with all the negative behaviors that come with it.

Montréal, Québec, CAN

Thu, Jul 25, 2019 3:03pm -04:00

2 likes 2 reposts 1 reply
Have you written a response to this? Let me know the URL:
- Balaji S. Srinivasan twitter.com/balajis
  
  I understand. I think that in practice, managing any large social network is going to require some way to come to consensus on *some* data structures.
  
  One way of doing that is N different system administrators, each with root. Another way is through blockchain-like techniques.
  
  Thu, Jul 25, 2019 9:17pm +00:00 (via brid-gy.appspot.com)

Posted in /replies using quill.p3k.io